Archaeological
Geophysics
Consulting |
Putnam County,
WV |

|
|
This geophysical survey was conducted at the Putnam
County Development Authority (PCDA) site located southeast of Fraziers
Bottom, West Virginia by D’Appolonia Environmental Services, Inc. (D’Appolonia)
on behalf of Dr. Gloria Gozdzik, Horizon Research Consultants of
Morgantown, West Virginia. The geophysical survey was conducted by Bill
Johnson and Don Johnson between April 17 and May 1, 2003. The
investigation consisted of magnetometer, resistance, and resistivity
surveys.
The objective of the
investigation was to apply geophysical technology to identify possible
prehistoric cultural features in a 10-acre (4 hectare) site adjacent to
the Kanawha River about one mile southeast of the town of Fraziers
Bottom, West Virginia. The property is being considered for
development by the PCDA. Phase I level archaeological studies over
the entire property were conducted in the 1990s and prior to this study
the northern part of the site had been identified as site 46PU159.
The Phase I survey encountered 1,036 artifacts from systematic
collection at 171 locations and five trenches.
|
 |
The Phase I study determined that 46PU159 extends southward
through the entire site and probably farther south. Artifact
density was found to be greater on the portion of the site with
a higher elevation, identified as being a natural levee. The
“levee” portion of the site is found between site eastings of
about 30 to 60 meters. Artifacts recovered from the site
indicate use of the site during the Early and Late Archaic and
the Early, Middle and Late Woodland periods. Artifact classes
identified (chert, debitage, projectile points, scrapers, drills
and a single pottery sherd) suggest that this multi-component
prehistoric site may have been used either as a resource
extraction camp, a seasonal habitation site, or both of these
types of site during its long period of use.
|
|
 |
In addition to the plow furrows (oriented to grid north), the
vertical magnetic gradient map shows numerous small magnetic
highs that are concentrated on the crest of the levee. Based on
their shape, the anomalies do not appear to be associated with
metal nor do they appear to be of geologic origin as the levee
and terrace soils are fine grained and typically would not
include cobbles or boulders that could produce the anomalies
observed. Where they are not otherwise associated with
resistance lows (interpreted to be pit features), the magnetic
anomalies are interpreted as being associated with prehistoric
cultural features such as fire hearths .
|
|
 |
The resistance map shows higher
resistance values associated with top of the levee and lower
resistance values east of the levee. As
levees are formed as overbank deposits under flood conditions,
it is not unexpected that the levee would have a higher sand
content and a corresponding higher resistivity than the lower
terrace area.
A significant
observation from the resistance measurements is the presence of
43 discrete low resistivity anomalies. These are
interpreted to be pit features. Some of the most prominent
resistivity lows are associated with magnetic highs with the
most prominent of these features being located at 72E, 250N and
65E, 239N. We have observed similar associated anomalies
with pit features at other prehistoric sites.
|
|
 |
Resistivity surveys provide depth information not provided by
typical resistance surveys. We collected resistivity data to
provide cross sections through selected interpreted pit features
as well as to provide cross sections of soil stratigraphy.
The E-W resistivity profiles indicate that
the terrace area is a soil of lower resistivity (probable higher
clay content) that drapes over a higher resistivity soil that
appears to be contiguous with the soil at the top of the levee.
The thickness of the terrace soil in the eastern part of the
area investigated (east end of Line 4) is about 2.5 to 3 meters.
This suggests that younger sediments cover an older land surface
where additional archaeological features could be encountered.
Resistivity cross section over interpreted pits indicate these
features to be 1 to 2 meters deep.
|
|
 |
The fundamental
observation is that most of the geophysical anomalies
interpreted to be of cultural origin are located on or near the
top of the levee. The flat terrace surface on the river
side (east side) of the levee is relatively featureless.
North of about 180 meters North, the
relatively high resistance values correspond closely with the
crest of the levee. South of about 180 meters N, however,
the highest resistance values follow a band on the eastern slope
of the levee and not on the crest itself. This pattern
does not have an obvious geologic origin and leads to the
speculation that the distribution of the resistivity highs does
not reflect geology, but is a result of human occupation as
might be associated with soil compaction from a concentration of
living areas. The resistivity profiles indicate that the
resistance highs in the northern part of the site are a thin
layer, corresponding to the top meter of soil, which could
support the concept that the anomalies are caused by soil
compaction.
|
|
|
|
|